Traditionally, real estate investors have performed discounted
cash flow analysis by assuming operating income projections and a terminal value,
and then discounting all cash flows back to a present value. The answer to which discount rate to use was
often answered by using the risk free rate and then adding a risk premium
representative of “real estate” type risk.
Thus, a single discount rate was used regardless of how distant in the
future the flows occurred and how weak or strong the property’s tenants were
relative to the “typical” tenant credit profile.
So if the acquisition game is about culling out the nuanced
differences between seemingly similar assets (at least on the surface), why
would a valuation methodology treat cash flows, differing in timing as well as
quality, in the same fashion? Doesn’t
make any sense and may lead to missed opportunities or unfulfilled
expectations.
A “Real-Time Valuation” (RTV) model , Young (2006), can be a
superior approach to differentiating cash flows from multiple assets competing
for your capital. The basic idea behind
RTV is to incorporate the term structure of interest rates, as expressed by the
Treasury yield curve, as the risk free rate, and then adding a tenant risk
premium for each tenant on the rent roll.
A rating system of A through E is developed and specific rates are
assigned to each rating category. The
ratings and the rates are based upon the analyst’s intuitive feel of the tenant
risk profile compared to the general tenant market. The blended, overall tenant risk rating is
then added to an interpolated monthly Treasury yield, and together they serve
as the monthly discount rate. Although
Young suggests to account for rollover leases into perpetuity to obtain the
value of future leases, I suggest building in assumptions about the re-leasing
and lease up of vacant space, and terminal value, then discounting those cash
flows at the monthly rate and value at the developed discount rate at the time
of the projected sale.
Although valuation is the primary focus of RTV, yield
measures, explicit risk measurement and assessment, lease and property
duration, and elasticities or sensitivities with respect to changes in either
market rent or discount rate are additional benefits that come from the model
and pointed out by Young. The
implications for real estate investors are that the RTV model allows
measurement of significant differences in the risk and performance
characteristics of individual properties not seen in conventional analytical
techniques.
0 comments:
Post a Comment